Modern silicone implants come in many varieties. Understanding the differences between brands (Motiva, Mentor, Polytech, Allergan), shapes (round vs anatomical), surfaces (smooth, textured, nano-surface, polyurethane), and profiles helps make an informed decision. Final selection happens in consultation based on your anatomy and goals.
Motiva (Costa Rica, Establishment Labs) is preferred for technical innovation:
Mentor (Johnson & Johnson, USA) has the longest clinical track record:
| Feature | Round | Anatomical |
|---|---|---|
| Upper pole fullness | More fullness | Natural slope |
| Cleavage emphasis | Pronounced | Subtle |
| Natural look at rest | Less natural | More natural |
| Rotation concern | None | Must not rotate |
| Surface required | Smooth or textured | Textured |
| Patient preference (Turkey) | ~70% | ~30% |
Smooth: Softest feel. BIA-ALCL risk virtually zero. Higher capsular contracture in subglandular.
Textured: Tissue adhesion. Required for anatomical. Lower capsular contracture vs smooth.
Microtexture: Between smooth/textured. Polytech specialty. Low BIA-ALCL risk.
Nano-surface (Motiva): Patent technology. Smooth feel + anti-rotation. Lowest BIA-ALCL among textured.
Polyurethane (Polytech Microthane): Foam-coated. Lowest capsular contracture rate (~1-2%).
Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma is a rare T-cell lymphoma:
Detailed implant articles for patients who want to research thoroughly before consultation.
The Hidalgo-Weinstein study, rotation rates, BIA-ALCL implications, and why round wins for 85% of patients.
TrueMonobloc gel, SilkSurface, BluSeal, Q Inside chip — and how Motiva compares to Mentor, Allergan, Polytech.
Why FDA guidance does not say to replace at 10 years, modern rupture rates, and when replacement is genuinely indicated.
Baker classification, biofilm hypothesis, the Adams-Mallucci 14-point protocol, and modern treatment options.
The right implant for you is decided in consultation — based on anatomy, lifestyle, and goals.